“The accelerator takes small amounts of risk and offloads that aggregate risk onto a market of investors (the VC’s). Its Demo Day, which first showcases its companies, is a coming out event, like an IPO. And it attracts top young graduates, like my cousin, from across the world. I spent nearly a decade on Wall Street, and let’s be clear: that’s our model. Employing Type A personalities to shuffle around amorphous blobs of questionable value is not called a “startup accelerator”; it’s called Investment Banking.”—
“An incredible political and economic experiment is playing out within San Francisco and its metropolitan area. The tech boom and the hyper-gentrification associated with it are testing the resolve and character of the city in a way the city or any other major American city has never experienced…
We could end up witnessing a San Francisco that reflexively tightens up its tenant protections and votes overwhelmingly against condominium development projects… On the other end, the city could become a Manhattan-esque playground for the rich of haute cafes that serve $4 toast, a place where community development centers get evicted and replaced by fusion restaurants catering to the whims of the latest food trends.”—
I’m not advocating one solution or another, but NY’s building boom is probably THE ONE THING bloomberg allowed that made this stupidly expensive city affordable at all. Zillions of people are moving into SF. There aren’t that many places to move in to. What was going to happen other than send prices through the roof and make it unaffordable.
The same thing happened to Seattle. They build. Lots. And it stayed relatively affordable. And quite a nice place, to boot.
I know I don’t live there anymore, but i don’t think people are advocating tearing down the wonderful old painted ladies and whatnot. But as small as that city is, there are plenty of places to more apartments if they wanted to.
This is such utter horseshit. No, not the need to build more. We need to build more. LOTS MORE. But the idea that people with money, people who like cafes, people who like fucking Manhattan are somehow opposed to the Left…
Because the new DM app would integrate directly with Twitter, it could automatically display tweets from a conversation’s participants in the thread itself. This is a simple feature, but one that other messaging apps also could not offer, and it would give users additional context in a variety of conversations. For large groups that outgrew the constraints of @-replies, these embedded tweets would make it easy for users to see what had already been said. For small groups, these embedded tweets would enrich the conversation by giving a sense of what other participants were thinking about.
A stand-alone Twitter chat (DM) app by itself isn’t that interesting. But an app that allowed you to easily injected (public) tweets to chat about could be very interesting. I know I already do this in other chat apps — that is, paste in a link to a tweet and then talk about it with a smaller group of people.
Also interesting: a chat app that injected your own tweets into a conversation to kickstart dialogue with friends.
Early versions of Potluck did pretty much exactly this.
“Bill Walton was my hero years ago. Then one night we got to play against him in L.A. when he was playing with the mighty Clippers. The game was about two minutes old when Bill turned to the referee, and said [in a high pitched, whiny voice], ‘Tell Bird to stop pushing me, he won’t stop pushing me!’ Sometimes, it’s better not to meet your heroes.”—Larry Bird (via iamcausewaystreet)